<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Theological View of Philosophy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mattwiebe.com/2007/10/a-theological-view-of-philosophy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mattwiebe.com/2007/10/a-theological-view-of-philosophy/</link>
	<description>Matt Wiebe's blog about faith and life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 07:34:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1-beta</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://mattwiebe.com/2007/10/a-theological-view-of-philosophy/comment-page-1/#comment-4834</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 01:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattwiebe.com/2007/10/a-theological-view-of-philosophy/#comment-4834</guid>
		<description>WTM, cheers for the comments and the recommendations. My excursions into Barth will have to stay on hold for the moment, as I am currently exploring philosophy a little more explicitly than theology (even though the lines between them are always vague and questionable). My Barth day of reckoning will come, no doubt.

As to Vanhoozer, I&#039;ve read a bit and again, will have to hold off for the moment. From what I&#039;ve read of him, he seems to take some (but by no means all) of the &quot;sting&quot; out of postmodern philosophy for its Christian appropriation, and I&#039;m currently more interested in the less tamed end of things. But still, Vanhoozer does not seem to be escapable in the postmodern theological milieu.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTM, cheers for the comments and the recommendations. My excursions into Barth will have to stay on hold for the moment, as I am currently exploring philosophy a little more explicitly than theology (even though the lines between them are always vague and questionable). My Barth day of reckoning will come, no&nbsp;doubt.</p>
<p>As to Vanhoozer, I&#8217;ve read a bit and again, will have to hold off for the moment. From what I&#8217;ve read of him, he seems to take some (but by no means all) of the &#8220;sting&#8221; out of postmodern philosophy for its Christian appropriation, and I&#8217;m currently more interested in the less tamed end of things. But still, Vanhoozer does not seem to be escapable in the postmodern theological&nbsp;milieu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WTM</title>
		<link>http://mattwiebe.com/2007/10/a-theological-view-of-philosophy/comment-page-1/#comment-4832</link>
		<dc:creator>WTM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 01:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattwiebe.com/2007/10/a-theological-view-of-philosophy/#comment-4832</guid>
		<description>Yes, the journey continues, but I think you are well on the way!  Here are a few suggestions for pushing forward:

(1) Check out Kevin VanHoozer&#039;s first chapter in the &quot;Cambridge Companion to Postmodern Theology.&quot;  If I recall correctly, he discusses ways in which Christian theology anticipates certain positive contributions of postmodernism, and your epistemological point may be included there. 

(2) Check out the first half of Karl Barth&#039;s &quot;Church Dogmatics&quot; 2.1.  There you will find his theological epistemology, which is an attempt to apply the notions of &#039;sola gratia&#039; and &#039;solus Christus&#039; to epistemology.  This certainly has resonances with your epistemological point about sin, and gives you quite a lot of material to digest and move forward with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the journey continues, but I think you are well on the way!  Here are a few suggestions for pushing&nbsp;forward:</p>
<p>(1) Check out Kevin VanHoozer&#8217;s first chapter in the &#8220;Cambridge Companion to Postmodern Theology.&#8221;  If I recall correctly, he discusses ways in which Christian theology anticipates certain positive contributions of postmodernism, and your epistemological point may be included&nbsp;there. </p>
<p>(2) Check out the first half of Karl Barth&#8217;s &#8220;Church Dogmatics&#8221; 2.1.  There you will find his theological epistemology, which is an attempt to apply the notions of &#8216;sola gratia&#8217; and &#8216;solus Christus&#8217; to epistemology.  This certainly has resonances with your epistemological point about sin, and gives you quite a lot of material to digest and move forward&nbsp;with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More Epistemological Sin &#187; mattwiebe.com</title>
		<link>http://mattwiebe.com/2007/10/a-theological-view-of-philosophy/comment-page-1/#comment-4785</link>
		<dc:creator>More Epistemological Sin &#187; mattwiebe.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattwiebe.com/2007/10/a-theological-view-of-philosophy/#comment-4785</guid>
		<description>[...] About          &#171; A Theological View of Philosophy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] About          &laquo; A Theological View of Philosophy&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://mattwiebe.com/2007/10/a-theological-view-of-philosophy/comment-page-1/#comment-4784</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattwiebe.com/2007/10/a-theological-view-of-philosophy/#comment-4784</guid>
		<description>Hey Matthew, cheers for the comment. Your blog is in my feed reader, so comments may be forthcoming...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Matthew, cheers for the comment. Your blog is in my feed reader, so comments may be&nbsp;forthcoming&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://mattwiebe.com/2007/10/a-theological-view-of-philosophy/comment-page-1/#comment-4779</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattwiebe.com/2007/10/a-theological-view-of-philosophy/#comment-4779</guid>
		<description>Great post, and on top of the issues.  Look to hear your thoughts on some posts I did on religious authority.

www.matthewsblog.waynesborochurchofchrist.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, and on top of the issues.  Look to hear your thoughts on some posts I did on religious&nbsp;authority.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.matthewsblog.waynesborochurchofchrist.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.matthewsblog.waynesborochurchofchrist.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://mattwiebe.com/2007/10/a-theological-view-of-philosophy/comment-page-1/#comment-4753</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 02:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattwiebe.com/2007/10/a-theological-view-of-philosophy/#comment-4753</guid>
		<description>Well, just remember that that this is how I characterize it and that I haven&#039;t heard any good &quot;authority&quot; put it like this, and that the way I&#039;ve characterized things here will piss off Christians and postmodernists alike! :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, just remember that that this is how I characterize it and that I haven&#8217;t heard any good &#8220;authority&#8221; put it like this, and that the way I&#8217;ve characterized things here will piss off Christians and postmodernists alike! <img src='http://mattwiebe.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cam</title>
		<link>http://mattwiebe.com/2007/10/a-theological-view-of-philosophy/comment-page-1/#comment-4751</link>
		<dc:creator>Cam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 22:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattwiebe.com/2007/10/a-theological-view-of-philosophy/#comment-4751</guid>
		<description>A good summary Matt! Thanks for putting it this way, as I only get hints here and there of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good summary Matt! Thanks for putting it this way, as I only get hints here and there of&nbsp;it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
