<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Milbank on &#8220;New&#8221; Atheism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mattwiebe.com/2008/06/milbank-on-new-atheism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mattwiebe.com/2008/06/milbank-on-new-atheism/</link>
	<description>Matt Wiebe's blog about faith and life.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Samuel Skinner</title>
		<link>http://mattwiebe.com/2008/06/milbank-on-new-atheism/#comment-9418</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel Skinner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 16:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattwiebe.com/?p=383#comment-9418</guid>
		<description>Will, given that that is the only thing most atheists care about in this debate (truth), you'd think he'd focus on it.

Yes, you could convert almost all atheists if you could prove your case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will, given that that is the only thing most atheists care about in this debate (truth), you&#8217;d think he&#8217;d focus on it.</p>
<p>Yes, you could convert almost all atheists if you could prove your&nbsp;case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://mattwiebe.com/2008/06/milbank-on-new-atheism/#comment-9390</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 23:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattwiebe.com/?p=383#comment-9390</guid>
		<description>That depends if your definition of the "whole" point is narrowed down to only the question of God's existence. In my opinion, merely focusing on that to the exclusion of questions of history, culture, etc. that Milbank addresses would make for a very dull discourse indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That depends if your definition of the &#8220;whole&#8221; point is narrowed down to only the question of God&#8217;s existence. In my opinion, merely focusing on that to the exclusion of questions of history, culture, etc. that Milbank addresses would make for a very dull discourse&nbsp;indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel Skinner</title>
		<link>http://mattwiebe.com/2008/06/milbank-on-new-atheism/#comment-9387</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel Skinner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 20:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattwiebe.com/?p=383#comment-9387</guid>
		<description>Is it just me or does he completely ignore the whole point? That God doesn't exist. I mean, he doesn't even both adressing this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me or does he completely ignore the whole point? That God doesn&#8217;t exist. I mean, he doesn&#8217;t even both adressing&nbsp;this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
