<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: God is Not Dead Yet?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mattwiebe.com/2008/07/god-is-not-dead-yet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mattwiebe.com/2008/07/god-is-not-dead-yet/</link>
	<description>Matt Wiebe's blog about faith and life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 07:34:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1-beta</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://mattwiebe.com/2008/07/god-is-not-dead-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-10273</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattwiebe.com/?p=394#comment-10273</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Nathan&lt;/strong&gt;: I&#039;ll have a look at it, and then we&#039;ll see if it warrants a response or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Nathan</strong>: I&#8217;ll have a look at it, and then we&#8217;ll see if it warrants a response or&nbsp;not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://mattwiebe.com/2008/07/god-is-not-dead-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-10244</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 21:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattwiebe.com/?p=394#comment-10244</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;mountainguy&lt;/strong&gt;: Thanks for reading and commenting. And yes, as you say, Dawkins owes a large debt to Paley&#039;s arguments, at least insofar as he begins with the same premises (the natural world seems to be designed) and winds up with the opposite conclusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>mountainguy</strong>: Thanks for reading and commenting. And yes, as you say, Dawkins owes a large debt to Paley&#8217;s arguments, at least insofar as he begins with the same premises (the natural world seems to be designed) and winds up with the opposite&nbsp;conclusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Schneider</title>
		<link>http://mattwiebe.com/2008/07/god-is-not-dead-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-10222</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Schneider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattwiebe.com/?p=394#comment-10222</guid>
		<description>Let me invite you to see my response to &quot;God Is Not Dead Yet&quot; that has just been published at the web-mag &lt;em&gt;Religion Dispatches&lt;/em&gt;. I&#039;m eager for readers and feedback, so I&#039;d love to hear if you have any reactions.

At &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.religiondispatches.org/Gui/Content.aspx?Page=AR&amp;Id=357&amp;SP=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Religion Dispatches&lt;/a&gt;. 
A mention of it on my blog, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.therowboat.com/2008/07/still-not-dead-yet-for-now-at-least/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Row Boat&lt;/a&gt;.

If you do respond on your blog, let me know, and I&#039;d be happy to link to it from mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me invite you to see my response to &#8220;God Is Not Dead Yet&#8221; that has just been published at the web-mag <em>Religion Dispatches</em>. I&#8217;m eager for readers and feedback, so I&#8217;d love to hear if you have any&nbsp;reactions.</p>
<p>At <a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org/Gui/Content.aspx?Page=AR&amp;Id=357&amp;SP=1">Religion Dispatches</a>.<br />
A mention of it on my blog, <a href="http://www.therowboat.com/2008/07/still-not-dead-yet-for-now-at-least/">The Row&nbsp;Boat</a>.</p>
<p>If you do respond on your blog, let me know, and I&#8217;d be happy to link to it from&nbsp;mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mountainguy</title>
		<link>http://mattwiebe.com/2008/07/god-is-not-dead-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-10196</link>
		<dc:creator>mountainguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 00:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattwiebe.com/?p=394#comment-10196</guid>
		<description>I think that &quot;rational faith&quot; and natural theology are interesting issues, but like you, I&#039;m more intertested in what you say: &quot;seeing the logic of the crucifixion and non-violent resistance infiltrate our thinking&quot;, and aslo, I&#039;m getting some interest in continental philosophy.

BTW (how ironical) Dawkins thinking is really close to Paley&#039;s &quot;natural theology&quot;. Or, better said, Dawkins continues upon most of the Paley&#039;s views through his atheistic view of nature (i.e. neo.darwinism. I&#039;m evolutionist, but I&#039;m a little critic of some issues on neo-darwinism)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that &#8220;rational faith&#8221; and natural theology are interesting issues, but like you, I&#8217;m more intertested in what you say: &#8220;seeing the logic of the crucifixion and non-violent resistance infiltrate our thinking&#8221;, and aslo, I&#8217;m getting some interest in continental&nbsp;philosophy.</p>
<p>BTW (how ironical) Dawkins thinking is really close to Paley&#8217;s &#8220;natural theology&#8221;. Or, better said, Dawkins continues upon most of the Paley&#8217;s views through his atheistic view of nature (i.e. neo.darwinism. I&#8217;m evolutionist, but I&#8217;m a little critic of some issues on&nbsp;neo-darwinism)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
